17-01-2010

Who is fooling who?

Do you get the feeling that whatever someone said, which would contradict the Genesis version of events, that there is always someone who suddenly have found flaws in that proposition.

The fact that the flaws are based on pure fantasy such as the Genesis version of events is not a point for the objectors of the proposition.

Take as an example a Newsweek magazine publication a while back publishing a commentary of Richard Dawkins. He launched in that commentary publication some arguments against the creationists.

He admitted, “What would be evidence against evolution, and very strong evidence at that, would be the discovery of even a single fossil in the wrong geological stratum.

And there you have it, WHAM!!, up popped the Creation research, this are the ones who are able to make Genesis look like a real happened story, and who will do all it needs to proof that this is seen as a fact. They do this without displaying any form of evidence.

Creation research is up the forefront of suggestive science. Suggestive science being something promoting that does not exist and for what no proof is required.

You see they say, out of place fossils are actual common, because Creation research says so. Ok we cannot proof it but we can make a lengthy publication which will show that we are maybe right. Their examples of out of place fossils, may have, and we place the intention on may have, as proof does not exist, existed.

That “may have” is related to the Genesis example as that also “may have” existed, it would suggest that all what creation research does “may have” a relevants somewhere, then again it may not. And that “may have” is the base for the making of the creation research science, as they say.

This makes creation research an investigation in what could have been happening if the first of their “may have” would be a fact, that first “may have” is Genesis.

They are unable to proof Genesis, they could not as it was made up at a Hebrew meeting 2500 years ago. In that meeting the learned Hebrews streamlined their history by making it up as they were going along. They even included Ba’al the then present spiritual entity in that time in their history, and renamed it YWH. Fact remains that that they were one and the same.

Still the first popes of the newly Christian Church installed it as a fact, and creation research as brave followers still follow the footsteps of that early beginning.

Let us not dismiss the creation research as just a “we are right the others are not” bunch.
After all they have created a whole new life for them selves, have researchers who reading every paper in the hope to find something they can contradict. Above all it is all based on a story book of unknown writers, proclaimed to be a real happened story.

And maybe it is such a story, even with the many contradictions and more then obvious mistakes. Mistakes and contradictions which still exist even as the book is re-written many times and is re-written at the moment we write this.

There can be no doubt that in a couple of hundred years the book will be streamlined as a flawless smooth running bestseller.

It does not alter the simple fact that it is just a book, cleverly 2000 years ago promoted as a real story, although without any proof, but then again in that time when reading and writing was something for the well off and whereas the majority could do neither. In that time people were in slavery, bound services, and above all poor in wealth and knowledge.

Then suddenly there is a message that someone one day will alter that all, give you a better life, rich and rewarding; only a fool would say no to that.
Christianity was born.

As Christ had to come from somewhere, the Popes took over the Hebrew version as prelude to Christianity. That is how Genesis came into the world.

Problem was that in the last 150 years doubts was arising about that version of events, Darwin gave one of the first giant steps forwards to the suggestion of evolution.

That suggestion of evolution was a direct attack in the believe of Genesis, and as Christianity is a money spinner, it was obvious that a direct attack would follow of the churches. And so it did. However, time progressed; people became more educated and started to think for them selves. More evidence was found that did not could be put along with the Genesis story, so the creationist was created.

Now the task of the creationist involves several ways, they fist have to make sure that they have the opportunity to criticize all what evolutionist do, regardless.
Then the have to make sure that they are able to saw doubt into the minds of evolutionists. This was and is done by the way of stating, “You can be a non-believer, but what if it is thru. So many at a later age change sites just in case Genesis could be thru, you never know.

The floor in this is that if Genesis is thru, if the Lord will judge, than he will judge over your life and the switch do not alter the facts.

And as last resort they have to ridicule all what the evolutionist do. Remarks such as” you never find half evolved dinosaurs, is one of them, and this is correct, you would not find them.
As nature still shows to day, half evolved creatures are normally eaten by the mother or by predators. The Creationist knows that fact, but is still used to cast doubt.
The story of Genesis is now altered by the creationist as that the dinosaur was living from the beginning of Genesis, that they were there when Noah’s ark was build, that they even went onto the ark. Now this is an explanation wert to mention.
The ark, the dimensions well noted in Genesis, could not hold the enormous size of the dinosaurs. So how the creationist did explains this. And here we go.
All dinosaurs were of the same family, that of the dinosaur and in the arc went only the two smallest ones, not much larger then a dog. That in fact there where many species, now called dinosaurs in the daily walk but in reality are a different kind.
However the creationist does not have to bother with this as most people simple see them as dinosaurs.

It shows the length creationist will go to proof a non-existing point.

If we put the two next to each other then the evolutionist wins by a length of a mile.
None of the creationist points are proven, only suggestions is made.
Many of the evolutionist points are not proven, suggestions are made, but also research shows that the evolutionist is getting somewhere, even if it will take time in the future, they are standing only at the foothold of the discovery. Then again the creationist is getting nowhere.

They can portray themselves as researchers, learned investigators, but the bottom line is they cannot proof a single item. They only can suggest. They only can ridicule. They only can indoctrinate people. In fact the creation research is nothing else than creating suggestive ridicule to the work of the evolutionist. This without offering the smallest point of proof.

Creationist is, indeed what they say they are, creationists in suggestive creation based on nothing than a man made creation without proof.

This article is about creation, not about the existing of the Lord.

The Lord does not need proof, or a man made story, the Lord you feel in your hearth and soul, and you know He exist.